reddit/popculturechat
Neil Patrick Harris expressed his preference for ‘apolitical’ work when asked about the role of cinema in fighting fascism. The actor’s comment, made during an interview, quickly drew sharp criticism online, with many pointing to his past controversial behavior.
Advertisement
The discussion started on a popular pop culture forum. The moderator note stated that the thread required strict control because it aimed to create a respectful dialogue between participants. Harris faced the most visible response which showed disapproval towards him.
One highly-upvoted comment established a direct link between his recent remarks and a famous event from his past. The user wrote, “I honestly didn’t expect much from the same creep who celebrated Amy Winehouse’s death with a sushi-platter shaped like her corpse.” The user wrote, “Trash will always be trash.” The comment included an image reportedly of the 2011 party centerpiece, which depicted a meat platter designed to resemble a corpse. This reference dominated the thread.
Another user agreed with the statement, which said, “His choice shows he is a disgusting human being.” Many people who met Harris mentioned that they first remembered the Winehouse party. One former fan said that the man turned out to be an asshole.
People objected to his ‘apolitical’ declaration while they also condemned his previous conduct. The top comment explained that “Apolitical’ brudda you’re a gay man in the arts, your existence is political.” The public widely shared this sentiment.
Responders suggested that his privilege enables him to step back from his current situation. One reply stated that “He’s also a white man, he probably feels like this has nothing to do with him.” People believed that he would think that political matters did not concern him because he belonged to a privileged group as a wealthy white gay man. The user made a quip about how “he’s gonna feel different when the leopards eat his face.”
Advertisement
Harris wanted to maintain political neutrality yet people viewed his public persona and professional achievements as political expressions. The strong response to his comment demonstrates that his controversial history has damaged his reputation among certain audience members. The story continues to circulate as a point of contention regarding celebrity responsibility and past actions. David Burtka, his husband, often features in his public life.