X/@SenJohnKennedy
In social media, Senator John Kennedy was saying that under whatever kind of regime the U.S. Army had grown 250 years, he had always made the world “a safer and freer place” from America’s own fight for independence. One of his posts showing soldiers lined in formation was basically a shout to the valour of the sitting forces, with those few remembered for dying for us.
Advertisement
The starkly patriotic view inclined to see rows and rows of uniformed soldiers standing at attention-a sense of discipline and unity that Kennedy-cherished himself within the message. An apparent simple sentiment, reactions never were.
Some supported Kennedy’s tribute. One user called him a “national treasure” while another stated, “This is the way. Thank you, John.” One Navy vet also gave his two cents and jokingly proposed putting down $100 that the Navy wouldn’t get the same birthday treat.
While some were celebrating, forces against Kennedy had cast charges against him on veteran affairs, with one user accusing him of hypocrisy, “Yet you’re kicking veterans out of their jobs, cutting their Social Security.” Another sarcastically mentioned memories of intention to kill 80,000 jobs at the VA of the Trump Administration: “We will all remember your heartfelt comments.”
In this process, some political tensions found great inflation. One dissenting voice said the post was just performative and his timeline was “full of obligatory tweets” that allow him to check off every patriotic box. Going a bit further, others accused him of serving a foreign interest of Israel rather than America: “You serve Israel. You’re not an American,” came the cutting reply.
Things really took a sharp turn when one user connected the Army’s legacy with broader geopolitical conflicts by asking Kennedy to clarify who unleashed his destabilization upon the Middle East by backing regime changes; meanwhile, another user called him a “hypocrite” and a “draft dodger” for January 6.
The conversations turned abysmally dark in one instance. One commenter declared that the U.S. government “lost faith” in its ability to lead, and another defended the Army by saying it had “started wars and killed millions of innocents”.
Thus, a seemingly-uncontroversial post very soon became a lightning rod for larger frustrations-mouths on military spending, care for veterans, and America’s position in the world. The fissure-like differences in response showed that even a simple salute could be seen as a referendum on leadership, policy, and national identity.
Advertisement
For the time being, the Senator’s message stands as both an homage and a Rorschach test-the same sentiment some interpret as a wholehearted thank you, while others dismiss as not worth memory. Even an Army birthday wish does not stand exempt from being politicized on social media.